Being the only girl in the group reflections

Last week our Women in ICT group lunch event was titled “Being the only girl in the group: strategies for success”. I presented the attendees with some scenarios, gleaned from a Resource Booklet for Female Graduate Students, created by the School of IS at another university in 2002. Students discussed the scenario’s (eg. my ideas are overlooked, trivialized. My group excludes me. I keep being assigned the note taking tasks, being criticized more than others) and provided strategies for dealing with this. Several things struck me. Each of these women discussed the point that it may be more trust at stake than gender. Their strategies involved being prepared, taking the lead, gaining the groups confidence. We are still only 18% of the Faculty, but what a positive and powerful 18% these women are. The second thing that was important last week was that our lunch was held in a new Women’s space on campus. I remembered my recollections of the Women’s room in the university I attended in the 1970s. Some of the students were thrilled to find this space, with a kitchen attached, where they could work or socialise. We talked about the relatively short time that women have been permitted to study on university campuses (120 yrs). We have come a long way as a group – women are more than 56% of the cohort of most university student bodies these daysin Australia- but we are also aware that there is a long road ahead to normalise the expectation that ICT is a career for women. I left the lunch feeling very positive about the outlook of these women, however the task ahead for all of us is to alter societal stereotypes and expectations of careers for women.

September 17, 2012. Tags: , , . Gender, ICT. Leave a comment.

Great idea, but where is the T for Technology (STEM)

Great idea, but where is the T for Technology (STEM).

June 21, 2012. Tags: . Gender, ICT. Leave a comment.

Is it just about image? Does computer engineering Barbie discourage girls? Really?

 I trawl through a lot of media, blogs and articles, like most of my colleagues, and also get some sent to me because of my known interest in gender and computing. I read this one just today, it was sent to me Monday by a friend. Does Computer Engineering Barbie Discourage Girls From Pursuing Math and Science? GOOD MAGAZINE | JUNE 14, 2012
http://pulse.me/s/agz6f

I have a Computer Engineering Barbie in my office at work (a gift from a colleague). I am not comfortable however giving her to my grand-daughter, and never bought a Barbie for my own daughters. I just never took to her over shapely proportions.

 However I ascribe to the belief that being a computer engineer and loving fashion, shoes, handbags, whatever… are not mutually exclusive, and that  there are many individual differences among  girls that one image portrayed by one doll can hardly be ascribed blame for a lack of interest in a whole career path.

I think we have to get past image – the lack of interest in this discipline, by girls and boys, is more embedded in how we approach teaching it  as well as how we apply it. Liz Dwyer comments in her post that the girls who won the Google engineering award were intellectually curious, tenacious and ambitious – not particularly gendered traits.

With an approach that promotes curiousity, creativity, persisitence and problem solving we may well do better in attracting more girls and a more diverse cohort of boys to our discipline.

June 20, 2012. Gender, ICT, Image. Leave a comment.

“It’s the culture stupid…” a response to the brogramming media

This is my first blog, it was a media article I submitted to the newspapers – strangely no-one took it up…Maybe the title could have been toned down, but honestly … why?

Caroline Simmard from Stanford was motivated to respond  to the blog post  “Why aren’t there more women in tech: wrong question” with the above comment.  This all came in quick succession after a series of posts and emails earlier in March deploring the media reporting of the “Brogramming” Facebook group,  and closely followed by the “One step at a time” post of a young female software engineer who loves her job and challenges the male stereotypes daily. Media articles like ‘Brogramming” do no more than replace one male stereotype (geeky unsocial) with another (macho bravado). Neither are particularly attractive to females.

Caroline is one of dozens of smart scientists, educators and researchers who are working to improve the diversity of students entering the creative and collaborative discipline of computing (aka  ICT, IT, IS). It is startling that in 2012 we have not made any inroads to increasing diversity in this ubiquitous and influential discipline.  But when the weekend papers show the current stats of women’s economic situation with only 1.4% of women earning more than $104,000 compared to 6.4% of men, I think we have moved beyond the media issue of male bravado and unfriendly work environments,  to the economic necessity of getting more women in our society credentialed and confident to become active participators in our discipline.

The National Centre for Women in I.T. in the US produces a “Scorecard” which highlights the latest statistics regarding female engagement with computing in the USA. I have complied the Australian equivalent , with a bit of a Victorian slant  and drawing on their format:

Women are underrepresented in the computing workforce. While they make up  45% of the Australian  workforce,  there are only 18% in computing.

Computing needs women. In the US work teams with 50:50 gender membership have been shown to be more experimental and more efficient than single-sex teams. Firms with female senior managers outperform those without women in leadership positions. Women found high-tech start-ups with less funding and fewer failures than the average. There is no reason to believe that the same would not apply in Australia.

Girls are missing out on computing education. Since 2001 the number of female students sitting the final VCE IT exams has decreased from 5879 to 643 in 2011. Only 93 female students in Victoria satisfactorily completed the Software Development Unit. The overall number of students sitting the final year VCE IT exams has decreased by 75%.  While VCE IT is not a prerequisite for any IT degree the pattern of declining enrolments is similar in VTAC first preferences for IT courses has declined 67% in the same time period.

In 2001, 686 secondary schools in Victoria delivered IT Units 3 & 4 . This has decreased to 443 in 2011 providing less opportunity for students to study IT in senior secondary school (in Victoria).

Women are more credentialed than men in our society, yet not in IT. Women now represent 55.6% of students on campus in Australian universities. Women earned 57% of all bachelor degrees in 2010. In the same year women earned 19% of undergraduate computing degrees.

If the solution was simple, we would have solved it by now, it is multi-layered and embedded in both the culture and societal stereotypes.

Australia recognises the issues of lack of diversity in the more technical careers. The 2012 Young Australian of the Year, Marita Cheng, was awarded this accolade  for her work in promoting engineering to women through her Robogals program.

Another program working towards greater diversity in ICT in Australia is the Digital Divas Club,  featured last year on the ABCs 7.30 show (Sleek Geeks, May 17) .

Digital Divas Club (www.digitaldivasclub.org) started in 2009 funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant shared across Monash Swinburne and Deakin Universities, the DEECD, the ACS, Netspace and Brentwood Secondary College.

A women (ex-FICT Swinburne student Alana George now working in San Francisco for Thoughtworks) created our portal and managed it for 2 years.

A women (Brentwood current teacher Anna Crow) designed the bulk of our curricula. In total 11 secondary schools have participated in the research (all but one have continued with the program).

In 2012 we took the program interstate and it is running at two schools in Sydney.

Twenty-two undergraduate (female) students have already been trained as Expert Divas and worked in schools with the program. Since 2009 we have collected surveys and interview data from 284 female students, most in junior secondary school, some in middle school.

We have widely disseminated our findings. Over the last three years hundreds people have interacted with the project via local, national and international presentations at conferences, teacher focused events, as well as regional and national print media and national television media.

We won’t give up, and the problem is not going to go away without active intervention.

Plenty of bright, involved young women at my university are supporting  the Digital Divas program by being our Expert Divas. As well they run our university Women in ICT group and volunteer for many other initiatives like the Go Girl Go for IT program. Working with these  young clever women is the highlight of my career, and with them I intend to continue to work actively to change the deploring statistics.

My advice to all who are concerned about the lack of diversity (women) in ICT is to become an evangelist for change . Make it personal and promote the positive aspects of the  I.C.T. profession widely.

May 6, 2012. Gender, ICT, Image. Leave a comment.